Article: The Myth of Darwin's Finches: Untitled
Views: 8, Replies: 2 » Jump to the end |
|
|
|||
| "... finches are separated not by geography but by ecology (the foundations of sympatric speciation had been laid)." - I've not read Lack and had not realized the implications of this simple statement.. "David Lack's 1947 book Darwin's Finches (though Percy Lowe had called them that 11 years prior), in fact played little if any part in Darwin's initial thoughts about evolution. He had collected a large sample of them when he visited the islands in late 1835 (September), but he failed to annotate which islands which specimens came from. " - I often wondered at the "common knowledge" that Darwin's theory of evolution was based on finches, when Darwin in Origin makes it clear he did not note the island from which each finch came. Thanks so much for your cogent presentations in all these articles! What do you do for a "living" since you are so thoroughly steeped in the intricacies of evolution. - Anne King |
|
|||
| Hi Anne, I currently work at a plant nursery. The largest in the southern hemisphere. http://www.cubits.org/TheExtinctionCubit a database of all species which have become extinct within the last 100,000 years. |
|
|||
| Lucky you - to be among plants all day - if you have to work, that's the place to be. I'm fortunate to have been retired for 15 years. - Anne (73 years young) |
| « Back to the top « Cubits.org homepage « The Evolution Forum cubit homepage « Article: The Myth of Darwin's Finches |

