Viewing post #635688 by AguaneAfter 13 years online, Cubits.org is scheduled to be shut down. Please make sure you have the contact information for all your friends, and that you download whatever content you want from this site.
You are viewing a single post made by Aguane in the thread called Nuclear Disasters.
Really good points. I appreciate your analysis and background and tend to agree. I'm new at this.
Here is the reading I did re the Chernobyl accident. There is an awful lot available on the Web supporting all sorts of opinions and view. These two views are probably at polar opposites in stating the facts (unknown to me, of course). Depending on the chosen scope that might be defined to illustrate a POV I tend to go with the IAEA and that POV.
Wikipedia reports from several POVâ€¦ the views vary a GREAT deal. I assume there are even more varying views from others. Iâ€™m going to edit my comment about the 985,000 deaths ïŠ
On page 2 this article states that the loss of life occurring between 1986 -2004 totaling 985,000 worldwide can be attributed to the Chernobyl accident.
This video (29 min) probably explains the scope of how that 985,000 was arrived at (always going to be a slant or bias in this sort of reporting):
"There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle." --Albert Einstein
~ All Things Plants, SOUTHWEST GARDENING ~Cubits.org ENERGY & POWER
« Return to the thread "Nuclear Disasters"
« Return to NUCLEAR forum
« Return to the Energy & Power cubit homepage